Find a useful starting point.
Map the task, review the available information and compare the likely benefit with the effort involved.
You get: a shortlist of use cases, a workflow map and the gaps to resolve.
AI consulting in Sydney to help you choose a useful starting point. Review a real task, test an idea and decide what is worth building.
Discuss an AI starting point ↗Bring a task that takes too long, information that is hard to find, or an idea you want to test. We review the work with your team and turn it into a clear assessment or pilot scope.
Map the task, review the available information and compare the likely benefit with the effort involved.
You get: a shortlist of use cases, a workflow map and the gaps to resolve.
Use approved examples to check accuracy, unusual requests and the time spent reviewing the results.
You get: an agreed trial scope and, where included, a working pilot with recorded results.
Review the evidence and ongoing cost. Decide whether to refine the idea, prepare a build or keep the current process.
You get: a recommendation and scope for any further implementation.
We agree whether the engagement covers an assessment, a trial or both. Production implementation is scoped separately.
Discuss an AI starting point ↗The number of tasks, the quality of the examples, access to your systems and the checks needed all affect the work. A trial using a few approved documents is a different scope from a system used by the whole team.
We separate the assessment or pilot fee from any build, software subscriptions and ongoing support. Pricing follows the agreed scope.
Before a trial becomes a live system, agree who checks the output, controls access and handles changes. Ongoing software care can sit with your team, Astir under an agreed support scope, or another provider.
Include model usage, hosting, updates and review time in the running-cost estimate.
One redacted example, the tools involved, the person who owns the task and a rough idea of how often it happens. That is enough to start a useful conversation.
We will clarify the problem, what evidence is available and the next piece of work to scope.
Compare repeated tasks and find a manageable starting point.
Read the guide ↗PLAN THE BUDGETInclude system connections, testing, training and ongoing costs.
See what affects cost ↗PLAN THE HANDOVERAgree who handles updates, failures, access and changes after launch.
Understand ongoing care ↗Already know the workflow you want to build? Explore workflow implementation ↗
01Your team spends too long finding or sorting information.
02You have ideas for AI but do not know where to start.
03Your tools do not work well together.
Examples to explore together. The right approach depends on your people, systems and information.
People copy details from forms, invoices or long documents.
Extract selected information into a draft record, with a link back to the source for checking.
Check missing fields, incorrect values and how much review is still needed.
Answers are buried in policies, guides and shared folders.
Search approved material and draft answers with source references. This is sometimes called retrieval-augmented generation, or RAG.
Test source accuracy, outdated material, access permissions and when the assistant should say it cannot answer.
Requests bounce between inboxes, spreadsheets and systems.
Use rules and AI where each fits: sort a request, prepare a draft and send it to a named person for approval.
Keep an audit trail, limit what the system can do and provide a clear way to stop or undo a step.
The same questions keep taking time away from more complex enquiries.
Help staff find an answer or prepare a response from approved information, with an easy handover to a person.
Review accuracy, tone and unresolved requests. Do not hide the path to human help.
A promising tool creates another place to copy and paste.
Connect the chosen workflow to the systems that hold the information and receive the result.
Agree permissions, error handling and what happens if a service is unavailable.
There are plenty of ideas, but no clear starting point.
Compare the jobs, available information, likely benefit and effort. Pick one trial with a clear owner.
Document the assumptions and decide what evidence would justify a wider rollout.
People have access to tools but are unsure when or how to use them.
Build practical examples around real tasks, explain what needs checking and agree how the team will share feedback.
Measure actual use and quality, not just how many accounts have been created.
An off-the-shelf interface does not fit the way people work.
Design a focused interface around a specific job, with the right inputs, review steps and boundaries.
Compare the custom build with simpler options before committing to ongoing support costs.
We look at the job first. Then we choose a useful place to try AI. We test the result and connect it to your tools. People stay in charge of important decisions.
AI helps prepare the work. A person checks the result and makes the decision.
A clear path from the first question to something your team can use.
Our Double Diamond method ↗Follow the task, listen to the people doing it and agree what a better result would look like.
You get: A shortlist of useful AI ideasReview the source material, access permissions and the mistakes that would matter.
You get: A clear plan for the work and dataTry one workflow with sample records, clear checks and a person reviewing the output.
You get: A small trial with checks for qualityReview the evidence, compare the cost of rollout and agree who would run and maintain the system.
You get: A recommendation and scope for rolloutIn-house app · In development
Forage brings recipe import and voice-guided cooking into one flow. Explore how the interface makes the next step clear.
Explore Forage ↗Consulting helps decide what to try, tests the assumptions and defines the scope. Workflow implementation builds and connects an agreed process to your systems, then tests it and prepares the handover.
Before rollout, agree an owner for access, output checks, updates and incident handling. Your team, Astir under an agreed support scope, or another provider can take that role. Software, hosting and model usage belong in the running-cost budget.
An AI consultant helps choose a useful business problem, assess the information and systems involved, and decide whether AI is appropriate. The work can include a pilot, software integration, testing and team training. The starting point is a workflow and a measurable result, rather than a particular model or tool.
Bring one example of the work, the tools involved, who owns each step and a rough estimate of time or errors today. Use redacted or sample information for the first discussion. We can then identify data gaps, access requirements, review points and a sensible trial scope.
Start with one repetitive job and a clear way to judge the result. We look at the information it needs, the mistakes that would matter and who checks the output. A small trial helps you decide whether to go further.
Not always. Connecting the tools you already use may solve the problem. We compare that with changing software before recommending a build.
Automation follows agreed steps or rules. AI can help with less structured work, such as reading a document or drafting a reply, but its output needs checking. A useful solution may combine both.
An assistant can be designed to use approved tools, but its permissions need clear limits. Start with draft or read-only steps, add human approval for important changes, and keep a record of what happened.
The scope depends on the job, information quality, integrations and level of testing. A useful starting brief identifies one workflow, its current cost and the result you want. Ongoing model, software and support costs also need to be considered.
Use rules when the inputs and decisions are predictable. A simpler form, a system connection or clear ownership may remove the problem without AI. Use AI where unstructured material needs interpretation, with checks for accuracy and a fallback when the result is uncertain.
The timeline depends on access to information, the integrations and the review needed. Before starting, agree the workflow, test examples, acceptance criteria and the decision the pilot must support. A prototype is not the same as a production rollout; deployment, training and ongoing operation need their own scope.
We agree what information a trial can use and who can access it before work begins. Where possible, we start with sample records. Important decisions need a person to check the result.
We measure visits, clicks and website use. Personal enquiry details are excluded. Privacy notice